Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inborn error of metabolism in which the phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) enzyme, that converts phenylalanine to tyrosine, is defected. This defect results in a high serum and brain phenylalanine level, which can lead to serious health complications. The primary treatment of PKU is maintaining the level of serum phenylalanine by following a protein restricted diet. Although the PKU diet is mainly plant-based, many items that are phenylalanine-free are also higher in calories, carbohydrates and fat, predisposing this population to higher fat intakes and obesity risk. High fat diets and obesity are two indicators of increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to look at fat intakes and obesity to investigate whether individuals, between the ages of 1-50, with PKU were at an increased risk of CVD. In this study, body mass index (BMI), body mass index percentage (BMI%) and weight per length (WPL) statistics were used to analyze obesity, while percentage of calories coming from fat (PCF) was used to analyze fat intake. This study did not identify a significant increased risk for CVD in its participants as all studied average variables were found to be within or below the standard. Although the standard for obesity was not met, this study did identify mean values in the overweight category and upper confidence limits in both the overweight and obese categories for individuals younger than the age of two and individuals older than the age of eighteen. Moreover, higher BMI and PCF values were found in females than males. With these findings, this study did recognize that females and certain age groups are at greater risk for the development of CVD. This study also identified lower PCF values in younger-aged participants, indicating a risk of fat, fatty acid, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies.
*Corresponding Author:
Nadine Assaf, MS, RDN, LDN
Nutrition Therapy Department, Methodist Le Bonheur Healthcare, 7691 Poplar Avenue, Germantown, TN 38138, USA; Tel: (901) 340-2859; E-mail: nadineassaf11@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Phenylketonuria (PKU) is an inborn error of metabolism in which the phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) enzyme, that converts phenylalanine to tyrosine, is defected. This defect results in a high serum and brain phenylalanine level, which can lead to serious health complications. The primary treatment of PKU is maintaining the level of serum phenylalanine by following a protein restricted diet. Although the PKU diet is mainly plant-based, many items that are phenylalanine-free are also higher in calories, carbohydrates and fat, predisposing this population to higher fat intakes and obesity risk. High fat diets and obesity are two indicators of increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Therefore, the aim of this retrospective study was to look at fat intakes and obesity to investigate whether individuals, between the ages of 1-50, with PKU were at an increased risk of CVD. In this study, body mass index (BMI), body mass index percentage (BMI%) and weight per length (WPL) statistics were used to analyze obesity, while percentage of calories coming from fat (PCF) was used to analyze fat intake. This study did not identify a significant increased risk for CVD in its participants as all studied average variables were found to be within or below the standard. Although the standard for obesity was not met, this study did identify mean values in the overweight category and upper confidence limits in both the overweight and obese categories for individuals younger than the age of two and individuals older than the age of eighteen. Moreover, higher BMI and PCF values were found in females than males. With these findings, this study did recognize that females and certain age groups are at greater risk for the development of CVD. This study also identified lower PCF values in younger-aged participants, indicating a risk of fat, fatty acid, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies.
Key Words: phenylketonuria, phenylalanine hydroxylase enzyme, cardiovascular disease, body mass index, weight per length, percentage of calories coming from fat.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Word Abbreviation
Phenylketonuria PKU
Cardiovascular Disease CVD
Body Mass Index BMI
Body Mass Index Percentile BMI%
Weight Per Length WPL
Percentage of Calories Coming from Fat PCF
Phenylalanine Hydroxylase PAH
University of Tennessee Health Science Center UTHSC
Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities BCDD
Percent %
Meters m
Kilograms kg
Less Than <
Less Than or Equal to ≤
Greater Than >
Greater Than or Equal to ≥
INTRODUCTION
Phenylketonuria (PKU) is a rare, autosomal recessive, metabolic disorder in which the essential amino acid phenylalanine builds up in the body’s blood and tissues. This is the result of a defect in the phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) enzyme, that is responsible for converting phenylalanine to tyrosine [1-3]. Phenylalanine is often found naturally in proteins, such as beef, poultry, fish, milk, yogurt, eggs, cheese, soy products, nuts, and seeds [4]. Aspartame, one of the most common artificial sweeteners, is formed from phenylalanine, aspartic acid, and methanol [5,6]. Two brands of artificial sweeteners containing aspartame are NutraSweet and Equal [5]. A buildup of phenylalanine can lead to serious, irreversible complications, such as memory loss, epilepsy, and developmental delay. Therefore, a life-long natural protein restricted diet is recommended to prevent these complications [1-3]. This can be achieved by being on a phenylalanine-free formula, a low-protein diet, and a low-aspartame diet [2,7,8]. The level of diet restriction depends on the severity of the PAH enzymatic defect [9]. However, the allowed amount of fat and calories in the PKU diet is not restricted, and is based on an individual’s recommended dietary intake, like that of healthy individuals [10,11]. The intake of fat is a minor concern for those following the PKU diet; however, higher intakes of fat are strongly associated with obesity and cardiovascular disease (CVD) [12].
The aim of this study was to investigate the potential risk of CVD in the PKU population by analysing their dietary fat intake and, depending on age, body mass index (BMI), body mass index percentage (BMI%), or weight per length (WPL), as described in Table 1. By using these variables, this study determined whether or not this population was at a higher risk for developing CVD. For the purpose of this study, obesity was analysed through BMI, BMI% and WPL statistics and fat intake was analysed through percentage of calories coming from fat (PCF). Lower BMI, BMI%, WPL, and PCF values indicated a lower risk for CVD. While opposite, a higher BMI, BMI%, WPL, and PCF indicated a higher risk for CVD [13,14].
METHODS
This retrospective study was done in Memphis, Tennessee at The University of Tennessee Health Science Center’s Boling Center for Developmental Disabilities (UTHSC BCDD) and the University of Memphis from January to November of 2017. Medical records for participants diagnosed with PKU were obtained from the office of nutrition at the BCDD for analysis. Approvals from the institutional review boards at both the UTHSC BCDD and the University of Memphis were obtained.
Study Population and Recruitment
Participants included in this study met the following criteria:
Food Records and Analysis
At the BCDD, patients or their guardians are asked to bring a three-day food record to every appointment they have with the dietitian. All foods and drinks, including formula, consumed the three days directly before the appointment are noted on the three-day record. These three-day food records are then analysed by the metabolic dietitian using an online program called MetabolicPro (Genetic Metabolic Dietitians International). The dietary analyses are then stored in medical charts, which were then accessed at the time of this study to collect the PCF data. All food records used in this study were analysed using MetabolicPro between 2010-2017. The dietary analyses created by MetabolicPro from food records provide calories, protein, fat, carbohydrates, percentage of energy coming from each macronutrient, and micronutrients.
Anthropometric Measurements and Analysis
At each participant’s appointment with the dietitian at the BCDD, the nursing staff at UTHSC utilizes various anthropometric scales to obtain weight, height, BMI, BMI%, and WPL measurements. The anthropometrics are recorded into each patient’s chart, which were then collected at the time of this study. The data collected was noted on a Microsoft Excel Data Collection and Analysis spread sheet by the parameter.
To obtain height, the nurse assisted each participant, older than two years, to stand in front of a stadiometer, which provides height measurements in both centimeters and inches. The nurse then converted the height measurements to feet and inches. The height measurement was then inserted into a computer system, which was connected to a floor scale. As the nurse assisted the individual onto the large floor scale, the connected computer indicated the participant’s weight and BMI, which was later converted into a percentile by the nurse. For purposes of this study, BMI% data was collected for analysis on participants between the ages three-eighteen years, while BMI data was collected on participants nineteen years and older. Based on BMI, participants were categorized by normal weight, underweight and overweight, indicated in Figure 1 [13].
For participants two years old and younger, a length measurement was taken by the nursing staff through an infantometer. This length measurement was then compared to the child’s weight through growth charts, obtaining the participant’s weight per length percentile. In this study, the WHO (0-24 months) growth chart was used for participants younger than twenty-four months [15]. The weight and height of any individual between twenty-four and thirty-six months were plotted on the CDC (0-36 months) growth chart [16].
Both BMI% and WPL in the medical charts were indicated as percentile ranges; therefore, the online website, PediTools.org, was used to obtain exact BMI and WPL percentages by inserting participant age, gender, height, and length information. PediTools is an online website that allows anthropometrics to be inserted and compared to different growth charts. Microsoft Excel Statistics (Microsoft, 2015) was used for the data collection process, patient stratification, and statistical analysis. Then, exact BMI% and WPL measurements were categorized to weight status categories using Figure 2 [14].
Patient Stratification
Participants were divided into different age groups (Groups 1, 2, and 3) based on their recommended PCF ranges (Table 2). Each group was further divided into males and females, forming six new groups for the gender specific analyses. The groups used in the PCF analysis were also used in the BMI and BMI% analysis. However, length measurements are taken on individuals younger than the age of two, as they are too young for height measurements; therefore, WPL data was collected. Due to this, participants in Group 1 were further divided into two separate groups: 1-2 years old (Group 1a) and 2-3 years old (Group 1b). A WPL analysis, instead of BMI and BMI% analyses, was completed on those in Group 1a. Participants were likely included into more than one age group, as the aim of this study was to collect a data set of ten PCF, BMI, BMI%, WPL values, which therefore, would have been reflective of appointments at different times of a participant’s life.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical analysis included the use of confidence intervals, which were constructed for the mean values of the PCF, BMI, BMI%, and WPL variables. If needed, a multivariate t-test, or Hoteling T2, was used in order to test whether the variable’s means were equal to the recommended values within each age group. Individual t-tests were used in this study, testing PCF values to the lower and upper limits of the recommended ranges for each age group, BMI to ≥30 kg/m2, BMI% to ≥95%, and WPL to ≥95%.
A statistical analysis was also performed on the six gender-specific formed groups. This study was to perform analyses on both genders in Group 1, 2, and 3; however, Group 1 was not analysed for gender differences because there was only 1 female so no estimate of variance could be obtained. Confidence intervals were performed to compare the recommended PCF, BMI, WPL, and BMI% values to the participant’s values. The individual t-tests were performed to test PCF values to the lower and upper limits of the recommended range, BMI% to ≥95%, WPL to ≥95%, and BMI values to ≥ 30. Also, individual t-tests were performed to compare tested variables between male and female groups.
RESULTS
Although the aim of this study was to include thirty-seven participants, there were a total of thirty-eight participants, ranging from 1 to 50 years old. With realization that collecting ten records for every participant was not feasible, it was required that every participant had at least one record that summarized their appointment with the metabolic dietitian at the UTHSC BCDD. Each record consisted of three-day food records and/or anthropometric measurements. Medical records utilized were from different times throughout participants’ lives; therefore, some participants were included into different age groups. The participant related information for the PCF analysis is shown in Table 3. Although all participants were stratified according to PCF recommended intake ranges, the variance in age affected the BMI, BMI%, and WPL data collected; therefore, the groups had to be further divided, as shown in Table 4. Furthermore, although BMI% values were collected on participants three years-old and older, two two-year old participants were found during data collection to have both WPL and BMI% data noted in their charts. These two participants were therefore included in both Group 1a and Group 1b.
To compare the fat intake and BMI of these patients with recommended values, 95% confidence intervals were computed as summarized in Table 5.
Individual t-tests were conducted to test whether the fat intake was greater than the upper limit of the recommended range for each age and whether the BMI is 30 or greater (indicating obesity). Then analysis was done considering gender and there was no significant difference in male vs female in any of the groups. The results are summarized in Table 6.
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION
An earlier study analysed the glycemic index, glycemic load, and metabolic profile of twenty-one PKU diagnosed individuals and established that these individuals consumed a high intake of carbohydrate and fiber and a low intake of fat and protein [17]. Consistent to these findings, a low to normal intake of fat was observed in this study. While mean values for every group fell within the recommended ranges, the lower confidence levels for groups 2M, 2F, and 3M fell below the recommended ranges. Not only did the lower confidence value for males between the ages of 4-18 (Group 2M) fall below the recommended range, but also the group’s mean value; therefore, indicating that this age and gender group consumes less fat and are therefore, at risk for fat, fatty acid and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies. Despite this, previous research has suggested that along with table food, these individuals are also consuming high fat, high caloric formulas, providing more means for individuals to meet their nutrient needs [18]. This study showed that individuals with PKU between the ages of one-three years, who are most likely to consume both table food and formula, are at high risk for fat, fatty acid, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies, as the mean PCF, lower confidence limit, and upper confidence limit fell below the recommended range. Of note, this study also found that the older individuals, especially those within the 19-50 age group, were likely to consume higher amounts of fat in their diet than those of younger ages. Although, all PCF values were within recommended ranges, except group 1 whose intake was below the recommended ranges.
Additionally, authors Blundell JE, Finlayson G, Gibbons C, Caudwell P, and Hopkins M looked at the connection between fat-free mass, resting metabolic rate, and energy intake and determined that men, having a higher amount of fat-free mass, consume more food than women [19]. The current study’s findings were inconsistent with those of the Blundell study as higher fat intakes were identified in females in both Group 2 and Group 3. Although higher than the male groups, both values fell within the normal range for total fat intake. Showing strong correlation, not only did the male-specific groups (Group 2M and 3M) have the lower PCF values, but also the lower BMI values when compared to the female groups (Group 2F and 3F). This finding is consistent with the findings of two studies done by authors, Gokmen Ozel H, Ahring K, Bélanger-Quintana A, et al and Burrage LC, McConnell J, Haesler R, et al which is, females with PKU have a higher prevalence of obesity than males [20,21].
Since, individuals with PKU are introduced to an atypical lifestyle at a young age, [22] such as being on phenylalanine-free formulas and protein restricted diets, substituting low-protein foods and adult formulas for high-caloric foods and high-fat infant formulas are believed to be reasons to which PKU individuals are predisposed to obesity [23]. A new interest in the dietary habits of PKU diagnosed individuals has arisen, specifically in regards to obesity prevalence and CVD [24,25]. The mean BMI values for participants 18-50 years (Group 3, Group 3M, and Group 3F) all categorized as overweight, falling between the BMI range of 25.0-29.9 kg/m2. Furthermore, the upper confidence limit for these participants were all within the obesity category, which identified that obesity is a risk commonly seen in PKU diagnosed individuals between the ages of 19-50 years. Mean BMI% values for participants younger than the age of 18 (Group 1a, Group 1b, Group 2, Group 2M, and Group 2F) were all found to be within normal limits; therefore, the risk for obesity within younger aged PKU diagnosed individuals was not indicated. However, this study did find that although the mean WPL and BMI% values fell within the recommended range, participants in this study younger than the age of 3 years were at the higher end of the recommended range, with an upper limit that fell within the obesity category.
Fat intakes and obesity are strongly associated and are two risk factors for CVD [25,26]. The type of fat consumed has a greater effect on increasing the risk of CVD than does the amount of fat [26]. However, both the presence of adipose tissue and obesity have been found to increase CVD risk through certain mechanisms, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction [27]. Although the participants is this study neither consumed excessive amounts of fat nor were obese, some groups did have BMI mean values that categorized in the overweight category and upper confidence levels that categorized in the obesity category. Individuals with higher BMI values, specifically those categorized as overweight and obese, are at higher risk for CVD. Obesity has been found to be the leading cause of CVD, with an impact on coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death [27,28]. An excessive amount of body fat can raise blood cholesterol levels, blood triglyceride levels, and blood pressures. It has also been shown to cause diabetes, lower HDL levels, and affect blood circulation and fluid levels, which all contribute to a higher risk of CVD [29].
In conclusion, this study analysed the relationship among dietary fat intake, BMI, BMI%, WPL, obesity, and CVD within the PKU population. This study included participants between the ages of 1-50 years and took into consideration gender differences. Based on previous research, it was believed that PKU diagnosed individuals were going to have a higher fat intake and higher BMI values because of their food restriction. However, as none of the participant groups had a mean PCF value higher than the recommended ranges, it was determined that individuals with PKU do not consume an excessive fat intake. More specifically, this study further recognized that individuals of younger ages are likely to be deficient in fat. Although this study did not look at the intake of fatty acids or fat-soluble vitamins specifically, this study suspects deficiencies in both due to the deficiency in fat and recommends this as a further topic of research. In regard to obesity, the mean values for participants in this study were within the normal recommended range; therefore, did not observe obesity in any of the groups. However, this study did recognize mean values that fell into the overweight category, and upper confidence levels that fell in either overweight or obese categories. Furthermore, this study found higher average values in females than males, indicating a higher risk of both fat intake and obesity. With this, this study determined that based on the studied population’s average values, individuals with PKU are not at a greater risk for CVD but encourages individuals with PKU to sustain a healthy intake of all macronutrients, not only limited to protein.
STUDY LIMITATIONS
This study has several limitations. One, the study had a small sample size and was only conducted at one facility. Also, three-day food records were used and can contain estimations, inaccuracies, and human error. However, since three-day food records are easy and straight-forward, it was the best method to obtain the information needed for this study. Lastly, this study wants to acknowledge that the plan was to collect ten BMI, BMI%, or WPL and ten PCF values on all participants; however, as data collection began, it was determined not possible. This data reflects the study population well; however, some individuals may have had less data than others.
Acknowledgements
A sincere thank you to my preceptor, Dr. Lee Wallace for all your advice, time, and mentorship through this process. Without you, this would not have been possible.
REFERENCES
PEER REVIEW
Not commissioned. Externally peer reviewed.
TABLES
Table 1: Definitions of Variables Used.
|
Table 2: Patient Stratification Based on Age and Fat Recommendations [12].
Group Number and Age Range |
Recommended Percentage of Calories Coming from Fat Ranges |
Group 1: 1-3 years old |
30-40% |
Group 2: 4-18 years old |
25-35% |
Group 3: 19-50 years old |
20-35% |
Table 3: Percentage of Calories Coming from Fat (PCF) Analyses Participants.
Measure |
Group |
n (Participants)* |
Gender Ratio |
Total Number of Records |
PCF |
Group 1 |
8 |
7 Males : 1 Female |
62 |
PCF |
Group 2 |
19 |
11 Males : 8 Females |
124 |
PCF |
Group 3 |
19 |
6 Males : 13 Females |
108 |
Table 4: Weight Per Length (WPL), Body Mass Index Percentage (BMI%), and Body Mass Index (BMI) Analyses Participants.
Measure |
Group |
n (Participants)* |
Gender Ratio |
Total Number of Records |
WPL |
Group 1a |
6 |
5 Males : 1 Female |
43 |
BMI% |
Group 1b |
6 |
6 Males : 0 Females |
34 |
BMI% |
Group 2 |
19 |
11 Males : 8 Females |
138 |
BMI |
Group 3 |
19 |
6 Males : 12 Females |
95 |
*Some participants were included into more than one group
Table 5: Results for the 95% Confidence Interval Analyses for Groups 1, 2, and 3.
Age Group |
Measure |
Mean |
Variance |
Lower Confidence limit |
Upper Confidence limit |
Recommended |
Mean Group Value in Comparison to Recommended |
Group 1 |
PCF (%) |
26.22 |
11.58 |
23.37 |
29.06 |
30-40 |
Low |
Group 1a |
WPL (%) |
80.16 |
303.5 |
61.88 |
98.44 |
5th to <85th |
Normal |
Group 1b |
BMI% (%) |
66.91 |
689.48 |
39.36 |
94.47 |
5th to <85th |
Normal |
Group 2 |
PCF (%) |
25.66 |
34.75 |
22.82 |
28.50 |
25-35 |
Normal |
|
BMI% (%) |
64.16 |
696.84 |
51.43 |
76.88 |
5th to <85th |
Normal |
Group 2M |
PCF (%) |
23 |
6.24 |
21.72 |
25.08 |
25-35 |
Low |
|
BMI% (%) |
56.97 |
786.71 |
38.12 |
75.81 |
5th to <85th |
Normal |
Group 2F |
PCF (%) |
28.87 |
67.14 |
22.02 |
35.72 |
25-35 |
Normal |
|
BMI% (%) |
74.04 |
475.09 |
55.82 |
92.26 |
5th to <85th |
Normal |
Group 3 |
PCF (%) |
27.88 |
24.39 |
25.50 |
30.26 |
20-35 |
Normal |
|
BMI (kg/m2) |
27.68 |
82.75 |
23.30 |
32.07 |
18.5-24.9 |
Overweight |
Group 3M |
PCF (%) |
26.92 |
56.50 |
19.03 |
34.81 |
20-35 |
Normal |
|
BMI (kg/m2) |
25.42 |
27.19 |
19.95 |
30.90 |
18.5-24.9 |
Overweight |
Group 3F |
PCF 9%) |
28.80 |
19.85 |
26.10 |
31.49 |
20-35 |
Normal |
|
BMI (kg/m2) |
29.51 |
109.92 |
22.85 |
36.17 |
18.5-24.9 |
Overweight |
Table 6: Results for the Individual T-Test Analyses for Groups 1, 2, 3, and Gender Comparison.
Age Group |
Null Hypothesis |
Alternative Hypothesis |
p-value |
PCF |
|||
Group 1 |
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[30,40] |
H1: mean % fat intake > 40 |
1.0 |
|
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[30,40] |
H1: mean % fat intake < 30 |
0.0008 |
Group 2 |
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[25,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake > 35 |
1.0 |
|
H0: mean fat intake ∈[25,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake <25 |
0.302 |
Group 2M |
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[25,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake > 35 |
1.0 |
|
H0: mean fat intake ∈[25,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake <25 |
0.03 |
Group 2F |
H0: mean PCF intake ∈[20,35] |
H1-a: mean PCF intake > 35 |
0.96 |
|
H0: mean PCF intake ∈[20,35] |
H1-b: mean PCF intake < 20 |
0.89 |
Group 3 |
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[20,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake > 35 |
1.0 |
|
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[20,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake < 20 |
1.0 |
Group 3M |
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[20,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake > 35 |
1.0 |
|
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[20,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake < 20 |
1.0 |
Group 3F |
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[20,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake > 35 |
1.0 |
|
H0: mean % fat intake ∈[20,35] |
H1: mean % fat intake < 20 |
1.0 |
Group 2: M vs F |
H0: mean PCF of M = mean PCF of F |
H1: the mean PCF of M mean PCF of F |
0.1053 |
Group 3: M vs F |
H0: mean PCF of M = mean PCF of F |
H1: the mean PCF of M mean PCF of F |
0.589 |
WPL, BMI%, BMI |
|||
Group 1a |
H0: mean WPL** 95 |
H1: mean WPL > 95 |
0.954 |
Group 1b |
H0: mean BMI%*** 95 |
H1: mean BMI% > 95 |
0.976 |
Group 2 |
H0: mean BMI% ≤ 95 |
H1:mean BMI% > 95 |
1.0 |
Group 2M |
H0: mean BMI% ≤ 95 |
H1:mean BMI% > 95 |
0.999 |
Group 2F |
H0: mean BMI% ≤ 95 |
H1:mean BMI% > 95 |
0.999 |
Group 3 |
H0: mean BMI ≤ 30 kg/m |
H1:mean BMI > 30 kg/m |
0.730 |
Group 3M |
H0: mean BMI ≤ 30 kg/m |
H1:mean BMI > 30 kg/m |
0.730 |
Group 3F |
H0: mean BMI ≤ 30 kg/m |
H1:mean BMI > 30 kg/m |
0.730 |
Group 2: M vs F |
H0: mean BMI% of M = mean BMI% of F |
H1: mean BMI% of M mean BMI% of F |
0.169 |
Group 3: M vs F |
H0: mean BMI of M = mean BMI of F |
H1: mean BMI of M mean BMI of F |
0.286 |
The Roles of Choline in Maintaining Optimal Health
The Effects of Intake of Bread with Treated Corn Bran Inclusion on Postprandial Glyceamic Response
Food Waste throughout the Food Production Continuum – Water Food and Energy Nexus
Use of Lightly Potassium-Enriched Soy Sauce at Home Reduced Urinary Sodium-to-Potassium Ratio
A Different Type of Critical Migration
PRECEDE: A Conceptual Model to Assess Immigrant Health
Walking Together: Supporting Indigenous Student Success in University
Cosmetic Surgery and Body Image in Race/Ethnic Minorities
Our articles most useful
Adrian Taylor and Marica Bakovic*
Published : June 21, 2019
Journal of Food & Nutritional Sciences
Zhimin Cui, Lynne Kennedy, Weili Li*
Published : September 30, 2019
Journal of Food & Nutritional Sciences
Elena Castell-Perez*, Rosana G. Moreira, Hal S. Knowles, III
Published : October 01, 2019
Journal of Food & Nutritional Sciences
Nagako Okuda, Makoto Miura, Kazuyoshi Itai, Takuya Morikawa, Junko Sasaki, Tamami Asanuma, Mikako Fujii, Akira Okayama
Published : March 27, 2019
Journal of Food & Nutritional Sciences